United States ex rel. Kwami v. Ragnow
United States ex rel. Kwami v. Ragnow
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Kwami.; Abdul-Bey appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action for failure to state a claim and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abdul-Bey v. Ragnow, No. 2:09-cv-00011-MSD-JEB (E.D. Va. Feb. 9, 2009; Mar. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.