U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Saintil

United States v. Saintil
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 27, 2009 · Agee, Hamilton, Wilkinson
328 F. App'x 879

Counsel

Lindsay Saintil, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Saintil

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpubhshed PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpubhshed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lindsay Saintil appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Saintil, No. 2:89-cr-00112-UA-1. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.