U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Saintil

United States v. Saintil
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 27, 2009 · Agee, Hamilton, Wilkinson
328 F. App'x 879

United States v. Saintil

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpubhshed PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpubhshed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lindsay Saintil appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Saintil, No. 2:89-cr-00112-UA-1. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.