U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Osborne

United States v. Osborne
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 29, 2009 · Agee, Hamilton, Wilkinson
329 F. App'x 473

Counsel

Ajamu Sawandi Osborne, Appellant Pro Se. Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Osborne

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ajamu Sawandi Osborne appeals the district court’s order granting in part his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Osborne, No. 3:98-cr-00322-JRS-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.