U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Bryan v. SCDC

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 30, 2009 · Agee, Hamilton, Wilkinson

329 F. App'x 497

Counsel

Terence Terell Bryan, Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, Willcox Buyck & Williams, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terence Terell Bryan appeals the district court’s order accepting the recom*498mendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bryan v. SCDC, No. 4:07-cv-00021-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.