U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

King v. Does

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 19, 2009 · Michael, Niemeyer, Wilkinson

331 F. App'x 241

Counsel

Moses King, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Mikhaylov v. United States (District Court, E.D. New York 2014)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Moses King appeals the district court’s orders: (1) accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971); and (2) *242denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. John Does, No. 6:07-cv-04155-DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 4 & Feb. 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and ai’gument would not aid the decisional jorocess.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.