U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Moore

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 3, 2009 · Gregory, Shedd, Traxler

332 F. App'x 33

Counsel

Ronald .Anthony Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Anthony Moore appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See *34United States v. Moore, No. 3:01-cr-00031-FDW-2 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.