Wilder v. Shalala
Wilder v. Shalala
332 F. App'x 87
Wilder v. Shalala
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Wilder’s request for rehearing and motion for appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.