Harris v. Whinney
Harris v. Whinney
332 F. App'x 100
Harris v. Whinney
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jasper Harris, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his suit for a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Wliinney, No. 3:08-cv-00296-RLW, 2009 WL 196435 (E.D.Va. Jan. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.