U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Harris v. Whinney

Harris v. Whinney
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 24, 2009 · Hamilton, Michael, Wilkinson
332 F. App'x 100

Counsel

Jasper Harris, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Foris Simopoulos, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Harris v. Whinney

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jasper Harris, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his suit for a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Wliinney, No. 3:08-cv-00296-RLW, 2009 WL 196435 (E.D.Va. Jan. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.