U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Huntley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 14, 2009 · Agee, Duncan, King

332 F. App'x 157

Counsel

Darían Avery Huntley, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

*158Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darían Huntley appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Huntley, No. 4:06-cr-00478-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.