U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Hill

United States v. Hill
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 5, 2009 · Gregory, Michael, Niemeyer
332 F. App'x 832

United States v. Hill

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kali A. Hill appeals the district court’s order summarily denying his motion to clarify the presentence report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See United States v. Hill, No. 2:03-cr-00162-PMD-1 (D.S.C. May 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.