U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Davis v. Reese

Davis v. Reese
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 6, 2009 · Michael, Motz, Niemeyer
332 F. App'x 838

Davis v. Reese

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible *839error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Reese, No. 1:08-cv-00096-LMB-JFA, 2009 WL 577594 (E.D.Va. Mar. 6, 2009). We deny Davis’ motions for appointment of counsel and his motion to defer payment of the filing fee. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.