Birchett v. Williams
Birchett v. Williams
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Edward Lee Birchett appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice for failure to complete a consent to the collection of fees form as ordered by the magistrate judge. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Birchett v. Williams, No. 3:08-cv-00762-REP (E.D.Va. Feb. 19, 2009). We deny Birchett’s motions for appointment of counsel and motion for a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.