U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Smith

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 16, 2009 · Agee, Duncan, King

332 F. App'x 856

Counsel

Tecarlos Derille Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tecarlos Derille Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 7:04-cr-00040-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. July 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are *857adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.