U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Stacey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 16, 2009 · Agee, Duncan, King

332 F. App'x 858

Counsel

Michael Stacey, Appellant Pro Se. Keith Michael Cave, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Stacey appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Stacey, No. 3:03-cr-00134-GCM-4 (W.D.N.C. June 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.