U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Alexander

United States v. Alexander
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 16, 2009 · Agee, Duncan, King
332 F. App'x 861

United States v. Alexander

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Corey Eugene Alexander appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Alexander, No. 3:01-cr-00216-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.