U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Pritchett

United States v. Pritchett
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 16, 2009 · Agee, Duncan, King
332 F. App'x 863

United States v. Pritchett

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Lee Pritchett appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to recuse the district judge. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pritchett, No. 4:03-cr-70162-jlk-1 (W.D.Va. May 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.