U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Newbold v. Stansberry

Newbold v. Stansberry
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 5, 2009 · Michael, Motz, Niemeyer
332 F. App'x 927

Counsel

Joseph Kenneth Newbold, Appellant Pro Se.

Newbold v. Stansberry

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Kenneth Newbold, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Newbold v. Stansberry, No. 1:08-cv-01266-LO-JFA, 2009 WL 86740 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 12, 2009; entered Jan. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma*928terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.