U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Banks v. United States Attorney

Banks v. United States Attorney
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 14, 2009 · Michael, Motz, Niemeyer
333 F. App'x 734

Banks v. United States Attorney

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Hamilton Banks appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Banks v. United States Attorney, No. 5:08-hc-02117-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 31, 2008). Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.