U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Swift

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 21, 2009 · Agee, Duncan, Shedd

333 F. App'x 759

Counsel

David Swift, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Swift appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Swift, No. 2:89-cr-00235-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.