U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Stowe

United States v. Stowe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 7, 2009 · Gregory, Hamilton, Motz
333 F. App'x 787

United States v. Stowe

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Jerome Stowe appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and his post-judgment motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Stowe, No. 3:96-cr-00046-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. July 21 & 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.