U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Stowe

United States v. Stowe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 7, 2009 · Gregory, Hamilton, Motz
333 F. App'x 787

Counsel

Reginald Jerome Stowe, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Stowe

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Jerome Stowe appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and his post-judgment motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Stowe, No. 3:96-cr-00046-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. July 21 & 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.