U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Gravely

United States v. Gravely
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 19, 2009 · Agee, Duncan, Shedd
333 F. App'x 792

United States v. Gravely

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Gravely appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Gravely’s Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gravely, No. 3:94-cr-00082-1, 2009 WL 981836 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.