U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Mimms

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 19, 2009 · Agee, Duncan, Shedd

333 F. App'x 793

Counsel

Reginald Mimms, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Joseph William Hooge Mott, Assistant United States Attorneys, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Mimms (4th Cir. 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Mimms appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a writ of audita querela, pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Mimms’ motion for a transcript at Government expense and affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Mimms, No. 7:99-cr-00048-JCT, 2009 WL 700415 (W.D.Va. March 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.