U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Hall

United States v. Hall
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 22, 2009 · Agee, Duncan, Shedd
334 F. App'x 540

United States v. Hall

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wainsworth Marcellus Hall appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hall, No. 2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-1 (E.D. Va. June 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.