U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Farley v. Brown

Farley v. Brown
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 23, 2009 · Hamilton, Niemeyer, Traxler
334 F. App'x 565

Counsel

David P. Farley, Appellant Pro Se.

Farley v. Brown

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David P. Farley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed in a closed case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Farley v. Brown, No. 5:06-cv-00209-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.