U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Michael

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 5, 2009 · Duncan, King, Motz

339 F. App'x 293

Counsel

Kelly Denise Michael, Appellant Pro Se. Corey F. Ellis, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Kelly Denise Michael appeals the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Michael, No. 1:06-er-00227-LHT-2 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.