U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Mason

United States v. Mason
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 6, 2009 · Michael, Motz, Niemeyer
340 F. App'x 843

United States v. Mason

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Mason appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mason, No. 2:92-cr-00163-4 (E.D.Va. Dec. 15, 2009). We deny Mason’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten*844tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.