Scott v. South Carolina
Scott v. South Carolina
343 F. App'x 864
Scott v. South Carolina
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Wanda Scott appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for waiver of PACER fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. South Carolina, No. 6:08-cv-01684-GRA, 2009 WL 750419 (D.S.C. Mar. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.