U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Sanjurjo

United States v. Sanjurjo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 14, 2009 · Michael, Motz, Niemeyer
346 F. App'x 965

Counsel

David Sanjurjo, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Sanjurjo

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Sanjurjo appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sanjurjo, No. 3:98-cr-00338-RLW-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.