U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Taylor

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 23, 2009 · Hamilton, Niemeyer, Traxler

347 F. App'x 962

Counsel

Robert Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Taylor, No. 5:93-cr-00132-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con*963tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.