U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Arnold

United States v. Arnold
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 26, 2009 · Hamilton, Niemeyer, Traxler
348 F. App'x 878

United States v. Arnold

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Arnold appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to amend his presentence report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Arnold, No. 3:05-cr-00046-RJC-DSC-2 (W.D.N.C. May 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.