Ebuzoeme v. Holder

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Ebuzoeme v. Holder, 352 F. App'x 773 (4th Cir. 2009)

Ebuzoeme v. Holder

Opinion of the Court

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Oyoyo Adanna Ebuzoeme, a native and citizen of the United Kingdom, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2009). Accordingly, we deny the petition for re*774view for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Ebuzoeme (B.I.A. Dec. 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Oyoyo Adanna EBUZOEME, a/k/a Oyoyo Adanna Ofurum v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Status
Published