Smith v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Smith v. United States, 352 F. App'x 779 (4th Cir. 2009)

Smith v. United States

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Michael Smith appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Smith’s Federal Tort Claims Act suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. United States, No. 3:08-cv-00427-MR-DCK, 2009 WL 1564145 (W.D.N.C. June 2, 2009). We grant Smith’s motion to supplement the record and deny the remainder of Smith’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Kevin Michael SMITH, Plaintiff—Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant—Appellee, and Dr. Patriba Chittra Medda, a/k/a Petriba Chittra Medda, a/k/a Chitra Medda, a/k/a Chiddra Medda, a/k/a Chittra Medda, VMAC Salisbury and Chrlotte Clinic 1601 Brenner Ave Salisbury, NC 28144
Status
Published