United States v. Coward
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit'.
Calvin Angelo Coward appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Coward’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Coward, No. 4:90-cr00052-H-2 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee v. Calvin Angelo COWARD, Defendant—Appellant
- Status
- Published