U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Armstrong

United States v. Armstrong
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 29, 2009 · Agee, Hamilton, Wilkinson
352 F. App'x 831

United States v. Armstrong

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Lyndon Armstrong appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Armstrong, No. 7:03-cr-00107-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.