U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Pierce

United States v. Pierce
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 16, 2009 · King, Michael, Motz
352 F. App'x 841

United States v. Pierce

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Lee Pierce appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pierce, No. 4:05-cr-00002-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2009). Pierce’s motions for appointment of counsel and to hold his informal brief in abeyance are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.