McDonald v. Warden
McDonald v. Warden
353 F. App'x 800
McDonald v. Warden
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Paul McDonald appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McDonald v. Warden, No. 8:08-cv-03503-PJM (D. Md. April 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.