U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. McDonald

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 4, 2009 · Gregory, Motz, Shedd

353 F. App'x 826

Counsel

Timothy Gerrell McDonald, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, Office of the United States Attorney, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

*827Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Gerrell McDonald appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McDonald, No. 7:03-cr-00029-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.