Booker v. Jenkins

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Patrick L. Booker appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, as well as the district court’s denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend a Judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Booker v. Jenkins, No. 2:09-cv-01891-HMH, 2009 WL 2461254 (D.S.C. Aug. 11, 2009; Aug. 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.