Warman v. Philips

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Warman v. Philips, 353 F. App'x 859 (4th Cir. 2009)

Warman v. Philips

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven E. Warman, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Warman v. Philips, No. 1:08-cv-00217-IMK-JES, 2009 WL 2705833 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 25, 2009) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Steven E. WARMAN v. Wayne PHILIPS, Warden, and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Status
Published