U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Burston

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 4, 2009 · Gregory, Motz, Shedd

354 F. App'x 764

Counsel

Curtis Burston, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Assistant United States Attorney, Kimberly Ann Moore, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Burston, Jr., appeals from a district court order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion for a writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the district court’s order and the record and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Burston, No. 5:04-cr-00371-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.