U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. General

United States v. General
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 3, 2009 · Gregory, Motz, Shedd
355 F. App'x 679

United States v. General

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tommy Carnel General appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for. the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. General, No. 5:99-cr00068-H-3 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.