U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Rouse

United States v. Rouse
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 21, 2009 · Duncan, Hamilton, Michael
357 F. App'x 521

Counsel

Anthony K. Rouse, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Rouse

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony K. Rouse appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2009). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Rouse, No. 3:01-cr-00015-jpj-2 (W.D.Va. Sept. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.