Bell v. Franis
Bell v. Franis
357 F. App'x 522
Bell v. Franis
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Richard W. Bell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bell v. Franis, No. 1:09-cv-00650-JCC-IDD, 2009 WL 2877079 (E.D.Va. Sept. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.