U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Rash

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 22, 2009 · Duncan, Hamilton, Michael

357 F. App'x 542

Counsel

Charles Emanuel Rash, Appellant pro se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Emanuel Rash appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence, which Rash styled as a petition for writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm *543for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rash, No. 3:01-cr-00025-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.