U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Wilkerson

United States v. Wilkerson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 31, 2009 · Agee, Niemeyer, Wilkinson
358 F. App'x 456

Counsel

Robert Moses Wilkerson, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Wilkerson

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Moses Wilkerson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wilkerson, No. 5:96-cr-00167-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.