U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Rutland

United States v. Rutland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 31, 2009 · Agee, Niemeyer, Wilkinson
358 F. App'x 458

Counsel

Quentin Orlando Rutland, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Rutland

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Quentin Orlando Rutland appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See United States v. Rutland, No. 5:02-cr-00031-RLV-3 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.