United States v. Rutland
United States v. Rutland
358 F. App'x 458
United States v. Rutland
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Quentin Orlando Rutland appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See United States v. Rutland, No. 5:02-cr-00031-RLV-3 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.