U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Rutland

United States v. Rutland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 31, 2009 · Agee, Niemeyer, Wilkinson
358 F. App'x 458

United States v. Rutland

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Quentin Orlando Rutland appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See United States v. Rutland, No. 5:02-cr-00031-RLV-3 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.