United States v. Downing

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit December 30, 2009

United States v. Downing, 359 F. App'x 378 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James E. Downing appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Downing, No. 4:05-cr-00052-H-2 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2009). We dispense *379with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee v. James E. DOWNING, a/k/a Marcus Moultrie, a/k/a Rahmel Lyles, a/k/a Ramez Lyles, Defendant—Appellant
Status: Published