Kiernan v. McKinley
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Javen Kiernan appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kiernan v. McKinley, No. 1:09-cv-00387-LMB-TCB, 2009 WL 2175639 (E.D.Va. July 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Javen KIERNAN, Plaintiff—Appellant v. P. MCKINLEY, R.N. Layton Lester, Warden, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Published